@savannahgary6351
Beyond a reasonable doubt and to a moral certainty! In this case, having watched the entire trial, I could not vote guilty with any degree of moral certainty! Also, one of my strengths is attention to detail and I saw issues with the defense in missing details to help differentiate for the jury. On the other hand, the holes in the prosecution case had enough holes to (easily) find reasonable doubt!
@CaraSoS
This is such a bonding experience. Similar to people that work on the road and never see their coworkers but know who they are pretty much. God bless Karen & Family
@LubiG1985
Yannetti stated off record that Bev refused to allow defense to call Berkowitz and Morrissey to the stand š
@pamelasale8992
Thank you so much for coming on today! We appreciate you!!! āØšš¼
@sunnyadams5842
Wait why do the pieces of tailight matter? Is not the only imptant thing ruling out the head injury being from an auto-pedestrian collision???. And, wondering- why was this jury not sequestered?.
@2Truth4Liberty
Brian ALbert could have had a juror friend that owed him a favor, Who knows!
@Nikkers8
oh no I missed you were live! Your commentary is always my first choice. Time for rewatch.
@tangledcharlotte
I'm glad you mentioned the possibly coercive effect of too much "encouragement" to arrive at a verdict. I've tried to make that point a few times and haven't been able to get it across.
@kitcarsoncarson615
Enjoyed the discussion. Thanks ya'll. See you next time.
@pamelasale8992
Thanks!
@Girlfromdownunder
It's great to see you back. I've been checking your page
@tenderstepsPaul
Given the doubts regarding bias of the judge, one would have thought a reasonable person (which a judge should be) would have striven to show even-handedness - I am thinking of the verdict form.
@foreverwander0320
In the past there have been officers convicted of planting evidence (seen on body cam). We know corruption exists but most people are hesitant to believe it in specific cases. But for meāThe taillight in the ring video (after the alleged crash) does not match the taillight in the Sally Port (once it was in police custody). This should be enough imo to prove tampering imo. The bite-looking injuries on Johnās arm and the āHos long to die in coldā search by Jenn were the first things that made me question this case. I figured the state must have a strong explanation for those or at least a lot of other evidence pointing to Karen Read. As the case went on, I realized they didnāt. One thing Iām wonderingāAs the Sandra Birchmore case gathers public attention and people start hearing the name āAlbertā tied to another questionable death it makes me wonderā¦ will it be harder for the DA to ignore public opinion and bring a new trial against Karen Read?
@Not_Squirrel
Andrea - I want to sit beside you on pop quiz day! You do your homework vs generalizing. I learned the actual MA rule re if & when a Touhy is issued. This is why you (& Jeff) are must watch š„
@EileenCostello-e6l
If no read back for jurors shouldnāt they be told that before trial begins like TAKE LOTS OF NOTES B/c u wonāt get to hear again if I forgot 5 weeks ago???? They canāt show a hold out a testimony that might clarify a confusion ?????
@SaraWoodsss
It'll be ok šš»
@docjaysw
Thank you, always enjoy your commentary.
@physics4290
I think the jury was pissed off by the judge's dismissive response: "You already have all the evidence".
@ClariceStarling45
To heck with listening to juror interviews after I want a real time reaction of the fed experts watching / reacting to scoober Paul on stand! Or Like a crash daddy vs scoober Paul debate!š
@PlanchonTV