@WalkinginDivineHealth

Maybe there is a time for different approaches to diet. If the goal is to acquire energy and steer that energy into providing fuel for healthy cells, we are really talking about electron availability. Diet is one piece of that, but we can also directly receive electrons from sunlight exposure on skin and also contact with the crust of the earth. Water must also be a part of the battery systems we call "cells". This is why different diets are going to work for different people at different seasons. 
We are electric beings and cancer is like a bad wiring system where energy is being shunted off into a black hole of growing chaos. Diet is only one piece of the equation as to why our mutated cells began rapidly replicating in the first place. Our cellular structures are not just biochemical they are atomical as well. So there is a lot of interplay within and between the cells that has more to do with frequency than substrate.
All that to say,  I think when it comes to cancer we need to be looking at how we change the direction of the box cars on the Electron Transport Chain so that we can divert the energy to healthy cells.

@victoriaolson8985

Dr Seyfried addresses these fuel sources with his two-fold cancer therapy - with ketosis  (withholding glucose) AND a glutamine (amino acid) suppressor medication. He explains this over and over. Some people aren’t listening.

@asaaz9829

Feeding all cells not only cancer cells

@sharkair2839

this is worth listening to over and over.

@postdata3631

Jay, can you do a video about diet for people with chronic kidney disease, including non-diabetic CKD? Not how to prevent it but what to do once you have it? There is no information on this except mainstream diet advice which I don't trust.

@firelight-vitality

Right from the start, this "expert" gets it wrong: "Mitochondria converts from Oxidative phosphorylation to produce to ATP, it uses glycolysis fermentation" 

This is incorrect—glycolysis actually occurs in the cytosol, not the mitochondria. The cytosol is the liquid matrix surrounding the organelles. Pyruvate, the end product of glycolysis, offers cancer cells multiple metabolic options. Some pyruvate is converted to lactate and expelled from the cell, while a significant portion can be THEN transported into the mitochondria, where it undergoes further metabolism.

Glycolysis is an anaerobic process, meaning it doesn’t require oxygen. While a small amount of ATP can be made in mitochondria without direct oxygen involvement, the bulk of mitochondrial ATP generation (via oxidative phosphorylation) absolutely requires oxygen.

@allenbrost9564

Wait, according to Dr. Seyfried, cancer can't use Ketones for energy.  What is truth here?  Is taking exogenous ketones for cancer a bad idea?

@firelight-vitality

Jay Feldman misses the mark here: "A high NAD+/NADH ratio indicates a good metabolism, while a low ratio suggests poor metabolism, and in every degenerative state, including cancer, we see a lower NAD+/NADH ratio."

While it’s true that a high NAD+/NADH ratio can be linked to optimal mitochondrial function, the paradox is that cancer cells often show a higher NAD+/NADH ratio than normal cells. This isn’t entirely surprising, as increased NAD+ levels fuel glycolysis, which many cancer cells depend on, and can actually contribute to mitochondrial dysfunction. Elevated NAD+ also inhibits apoptosis, giving cancer cells a survival advantage.

@scottsmith238

Are yall really that ignorant