@WunKoolKat
Way too much lens overlap with all the lenses out there. Just give me a 15-800 f2 lens with a super quick/short zoom throw and I’ll be set 😂
@Hodenkat
The Canon equivalent would cost $13,999 😂
@fardadpostwalatravels
The secret message here is that Canon is coming with a better lens , cause jared said it himself
@zanshin825
I mean, I get that it isn't exactly apples to apples-- but for most use cases, the Tamron 35-150mm 2-2.8 is a great lens that has been around for a couple of years now, and I picked it up for under $1500. If you need the 2 all the way through, it is what it is...but that's a steep difference to pay unless you NEED it.
@LOLOHO-GlobalAdventureClub
It's interesting how watching this type of video makes me want to purchase expensive lenses I have little use for. I want that 50-150 f/2! (What will I do with it? No idea...)
@SpecialBrewCan
I have (and absolutely love) the Tamron 35-150mm f/2-2.8, so not quite sure why anyone would prefer the Sony 50-150 f2 over the smaller, lighter, and better range, Tamron, other than the one stop of light?
@aldengoodman
how dare youtube keep this from me for 5 minutes
@saibabasattineedi5731
4:38 Sony news
@MartinV.
Great Video!!
@idol031808
I’m “bowled over” by the sheer volume of Fro content recently.
@daveinportland
One step away from the SHIRTLESS Photographer Badge. Well done.
@Kaeez-x6n
You can technically use Sony 50-150 on Nikon z
@Toggingdave
Ok, look, the M4/3 hate has to stop. It isn't dead. It is just niche. And it isn't your niche, and that is fine. But just because you have no use for it doesn't make it dead. That is like saying that because most people live in cities and never go off-road, pickup trucks are dead and no one should ever buy one. Maybe you don't need a pickup truck, but some people do. It is the same with M4/3 cameras. I currently shoot with an E-M1x. If I was shooting on the sidelines at a local stadium or just working in a nice studio somewhere, then yeah, sure, full frame all the way. But I don't. I need a camera I can put in a shoulder bag and hike up a mountain in a blizzard in search of the site of some ancient Japanese castle. Or just snow monkeys. Either way, m4/3 is the best camera for that specific task because the total kit is half the size (yes, even with the E-M1x) and half the cost of its full frame counterparts while still having all the 'pro' features. In fact, a lot of the 'new' features you've been excited about in the last couple years (i.e. pre-shooting), m4/3 had them first. So if OM Systems goes bust and Panasonic stops making m4/3 cameras, we all lose a lot of innovation that eventually makes its way into all camera brands and formats. So no, Micro 4/3 is not dead. It just a niche system that only a specific subsection of photographers really need. And every time you mock it and declare it dead, you diminish us all.
@pinkfatcap
NGL when I saw the teaser photo, I though this was the X-PRO 4, because of the film cutout display, as the 3 has the square screen showing you that. What fuji dudes really want is the xpro 4 actually.
@_Suzuka_Joe
I just spent my was on a 300GM so I'll have to keep my 135GM and 50 1.4GM for now rather than pickup the 50-150 F2
@warpspeed9877
I would like it a bit smaller and lighter. A 50-135/2.0 would be more than enough. Add a 24-50/2.0 and it's a pair that anybody would buy.
@FranciscoAlvarezTV
I just hope they open the RF mount before they start making these kind of lenses.
@benjamin.kelley
A 50-200 would be perfect for me as a wedding videographer. I don't really use anything under 50mm, and hate needing a ton of lenses to do things right.
@keeganflahive1604
Tamron has the 35-150 f2-2.8 and that’s plenty for me tbh that’s on Nikon Z and Sony. I have a Nikon Z9. It doesn’t limit shutter on Nikon. I only paid $1300 used. The Sony 50-150 f2 is like $4k 💀💀
@froknowsphoto